Pavel Kotov vs Siim Troost Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
P. Kotov vs S. Troost

Pavel Kotov
RUS
l
l
l
l
w
w
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
27
Age
25
6'3" (191 cm)
Height
-
454
C. Rank
0
50
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$1.1M
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Siim Troost
EST
w
l
w
w
l
w
l
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
27
Age
25
6'3" (191 cm)
Height
-
454
C. Rank
0
50
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$1.1M
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Kotov 1 - 0 Troost
They have played 2 sets in total, with Pavel Kotov winning 2 and Siim Troost winning 0. The last match between Pavel Kotov and Siim Troost was at the Estonia F3 (Tallinn), 30-10-2017, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Pavel Kotov getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kotov | 1 |
| Troost | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Estonia F3 (Tallinn)(10-30-17)
Pavel Kotov
6
6
Siim Troost
3
2
P. Kotov vs S. Troost H2H Profile
P. Kotov vs S. Troost Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pavel Kotov has won 43.75% of points on their second serve, while Siim Troost has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pavel Kotov, in recent form, has won 38.70% of their opponent's second serve points, while Siim Troost has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 18.11% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pavel Kotov has saved 55.74% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Siim Troost has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pavel Kotov has won 33.33% of matches played (W/L 11/22), with Siim Troost winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pavel Kotov has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 94/51), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 3/6). Siim Troost has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 17/13), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 15% (W/L 2/11).
- Player level: In the last year, Pavel Kotov has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 37.50% of matches (W/L 6/10), where as Siim Troost has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Pavel Kotov winning 1 times and Siim Troost being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Pavel Kotov winning 2 and Siim Troost winning 0.
- The last match between Pavel Kotov and Siim Troost was at the Estonia F3 (Tallinn), 30-10-2017, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Pavel Kotov getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:15:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pavel Kotov has played against opponents with an average rank of 213.58 while Siim Troost has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pavel Kotov has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Siim Troost has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pavel Kotov has converted 30.43% of breakpoint opportunities, and Siim Troost has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Pavel Kotov vs Siim Troost Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
P. Kotov vs S. Troost H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:15:0 | Average Match Time | 1:15:0 |
| 71% (37/52) | 1st Serve % | 54% (36/67) |
| 81% (30/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (24/36) |
| 53% (8/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (12/31) |
| 30% (3/10) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/2) |
| 46% (31/67) | Return Points Win % | 27% (14/52) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Kotov 48%, Troost 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Kotov 45%, Troost 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Kotov 61%, Troost 0%.
P. Kotov Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-2 3-6 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 7-5 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 7-6(8) | ||
S. Troost Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 6-1 | ||
Q3 | L | 7-6(4) 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-4 6-0 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-2 7-6(4) | ||
Q2 | W | 6-3 7-6(2) | ||

P. Kotov vs S. Troost Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.28% (292/209) | YTD Win/Loss | 41.18% (35/50) |
| 55.27% (655/530) | Sets Win/Loss | 45.36% (88/106) |
| 51.79% (5945/5534) | Games Win/Loss | 48.27% (908/973) |
| 53.17% (67/59) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.67% (17/13) |
| 58.96% (125/87) | Clay Win/Loss | 41.03% (16/23) |
| 62.99% (97/57) | Indoor Hard W/L | 12.50% (2/14) |
| 33.33% (3/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1718 | Aces Total | 201 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 1193 | Total Double Faults | 125 |
| 1:44:25 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 426.66 | Average Opponent Rank | 284.64 |
| 63% (21925/34835) | 1st Serve % | 58% (2037/3495) |
| 69% (15175/21925) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (1346/2037) |
| 49% (6346/12911) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (657/1458) |
| 41% (1431/3459) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (123/270) |
| 39% (13929/35370) | Return Points Win % | 38% (1230/3279) |
| 45.83% (11/13) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 34.78% (8/15) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55.86% (62/49) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 54.81% (114/94) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 72.39% (97/37) | Futures W/L | 41.67% (35/49) |
| 59% (281/479) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 41% (35/85) |
| 23% (3/13) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (98/184) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (10/21) |
| 58% (99/170) | Deciding Set Win % | 25% (6/24) |
| 86% (270/233) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 77% (43/33) |
| 14% (270/37) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 23% (43/10) |
| 25% (231/57) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 5% (42/2) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Sat, 22 Nov, 05:00 AM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 08:05 PM
PredictionSat, 22 Nov, 06:30 AM
PredictionSat, 22 Nov, 03:00 AM
PredictionSat, 22 Nov, 06:00 PM
PredictionSat, 22 Nov, 03:00 PM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Flavio Cobolli vs Zizou Bergs Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, SF, ITA – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Jeline Vandromme Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Maria Lourdes Carle vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Sydney Challenger Preview And Prediction: James McCabe vs Rinky Hijikata Betting Tips & Picks November 21, 2025

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Eva Bennemann vs Elena Gabriela Ruse Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 20th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
20:00
H2H 1-1
04:30
H2H 1-1
20:05
H2H 0-0
20:35
H2H 0-0
22:15
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Davis Cup, World Group, SF, ITA-BEL
Italy
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia